//
you're reading...
Economics

Three Wolves in Money Suits

We have all seen them more than once these days. The weird arrangement of letters, that looks like a schoolboy was on a hyper-active learning spree: AAA, Ba3, Ca, CCC and so on. These letters are indeed a marking system, explains Rebecca Marston Business reporter at the BBC. This rating system is supposed to inform interested parties about the financial liquidity of a company or state, to give possible investors reliable information for their investment decision. In addition these letters determine also the interest rate to be applied. A change in score means a change in interest payback adds Marston. The three biggest and most influential rating agencies are: Standard & Poor’s (S&P), Moody’s Investor Service and Fitch Ratings.

I have been following these rating agencies and their estimations of states, involved in the current financial crisis, over the last couple of months. Since S&P announced this Monday, that they will re-check the financial situation of European states, and that major downgrades can be expected, as Richard Milne warns in the “Financial Times”, I´m certain this issue concerns us all more than we want. I was interested in how these agencies, that are private American business companies, are able to influence a financial crisis, that is now widening to a currency-crisis. Secondly I was curious how these rating scores come about.

The Running from Wolves – how can You achieve the Top Grade?

AAA – that´s what you want to achieve. But how do Moody´s, S&P and Fitch evaluate states and companies? Mainly they base their judgments on a range of financial and business attributes that might influence the repayment. In a statement S&B gave a long list of criteria that include: economic, regulatory and geopolitical influences, management and corporate governance attributes, and competitive position, lists Marston. She continues, that they each have 40% apiece of the business of rating major companies and countries. That means that they make very good money rating states and firms, and since the credit crisis began in 2007, they get a lot of stick for their rating methods. Richard Milne quotes in his article a London-based analyst, who said, that, “S&P appear a bit like a comic book villain. You can almost hear them shouting: ‘We will destroy you all.’”

Wolves sometimes chew Bones and sometimes States

To mention again, a downgrade of an issuers’ rating pushes down the value of a bond and raises its interest rate, which makes it even more difficult to payback the interest and the actual credit. This can cause a vicious cycle. Most countries borrow money, by issuing bonds. Now if many countries want to sell their bonds, more buyers than sellers are added to the market, what reduces the price even further, meaning an even higher interest rate must be paid. Furthermore the given ratings never seem stabile. As Marston argues in her article: One day a country’s bond is graded a safe top rating and the next, it is given a mark that suggests investors’ money is not safe.

Why are We even scared of the Big, Bad Wolf?

Besides from Moody´s, S&P and Fitch, there are various more rating agencies, but why does everyone watch these three? First of all they offer their financial information freely to interested investors (they charge the organisations, which bonds they are supposed to judge). Secondly those three are acknowledged from the Securities and Exchange Commission (US financial watchdog) as Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations (NRSRO). An evaluation from an NRSRO, makes business quicker and easier for countries and financial institutions wishing to issue bonds. But to me they often seem biased – since they´re private American companies. Marston gives an interesting example: Loads of mortgage-backed securities – the investments that were backed by loans that were either never going to be paid back or were even fraudulent – were given the very best grade by the three supposed experts in rating the likelihood of the money being paid back. How can we still value their opinion like we do, I wonder? Maybe it seems childish, but I think if we´d stop giving their ratings that much credit, I think we would overcome this financial crisis much quicker.

 

Advertisements

Discussion

5 thoughts on “Three Wolves in Money Suits

  1. Anne! This topic is fascinating! You have some really interesting questions like:
    -“But how do Moody´s, S&P and Fitch evaluate states and companies?” and “why are we afraid?” When the US was downgraded by the rating institues the couldn’t do anything. They had their hands tied up. And at least a pair of them are america-based….

    On the transparency of these institutes, there are also a lot of things to say. I think I’ve read somewhere that none of the companies want to reveal all the criterias that they are basing their grading on. But they set the rules, it seems…

    Posted by Mattias | December 7, 2011, 3:14 pm
  2. Hey Anne! I really like your post! Also after all we’ve heard and read in class I think your post has a very solid basis. Moreover, you also seem to have made a really nice research and presented the information well structured und understandable. I like the metaphorical style in your subtitles, but in my opinion it’s a little bit confusing and doesn’t give as much information as needed, compared to a “regular subtitle”. Nevertheless, I really enjoy your writing!

    Posted by ingaz | December 8, 2011, 5:45 pm
  3. Anne, this is actually the first time I read your blog. It’s nicely structured, it looks good and I especially like the “about the juicepressers” part.
    I became interested in your blog post as soon as I read the title. In class and in the newspapers we’ve heard and read so much about the rating agencies and their influence. I think your post gives good information about the current situation. It seems like you invest some time to research all of this.
    I especially enjoyed your critical view and your personal opinion at the end.
    Looking forward to your next post!

    Posted by Martin | December 9, 2011, 5:24 pm
  4. thanks guys for all your feedback! I´m really glad you enjoyed reading my post!
    and thanks inga for the subtitle-feedback. I like playing with words and metaphors, but next time I will make sure it´s not confusing 🙂

    Posted by anne | December 11, 2011, 11:32 am
  5. Hey Anne!
    I really enjoyed readiing your post! You gave a really good amount of solid information which seemed to be researched pretty well! I do like the metaphors your using, though they made me wonder and think quite a bit, I felt like they gave the whole topic, which generally could seem a little dry, some creativity and “fun”.
    Great work! Looking forward to your next posts!

    Posted by Jessica M. | December 11, 2011, 9:19 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: